Production-Grade AI: Boardroom to Bottom Line

If your organisation has a dozen AI demos and not a single line on the P&L to show for it, you’re not alone. The past two years have produced a glut of proofs‑of‑concept, assistants in side tabs, and model experiments. What separates leaders now is not model access but operating discipline: turning experiments into production overlays on systems of record, with stage gates, deprecation, and KPIs that speak the language of the balance sheet.
This post offers a practical playbook to move from demos to durable advantage—distilling strategy themes, operating patterns, and engineering non‑negotiables from the book “Production‑Grade AI” .
Pilots chase features, not outcomes. Define the economic objective up front (e.g., cost per successful task, time‑to‑decision, error rate) and design backwards from it. Success is not “the model works”; success is “the business metric moved and stayed moved.” A quick sanity check of anti‑patterns and reframing advice appears in the book’s early “reality check” and executive chapters.
Sidecar assistants don’t change behaviour. If AI sits in a separate tab, people default back to the old way under pressure. Put AI in‑path—inside the system of record—so it intercepts and improves key decisions. Start in suggest mode, earn trust, then progressively automate. For practical overlay patterns and workflow redesign principles, see Beyond Chatbots and Rethinking Workflows .
Governance is bolted on too late. Risk, approvals, and evidence need to be part of the delivery path from day one. Capture what the system saw, decided, and did—automatically—so you can expand with confidence. The playbook for operationalising this is outlined in Governing Autonomy .
Treat AI like capital allocation. Move initiatives through clear gates and kill quickly when the evidence isn’t there.
Gate 0: Value hypothesis and constraints. Name the workflow, owner, target metric, and risk tier. If you can’t name the system of record you’ll overlay, don’t start. See leadership expectations in the CEO chapter on mandate and cadence.
Gate 1: In‑path prototype. Ship a real overlay on real data with logging, approvals, and rollbacks. “Assistant on the side” doesn’t count. Patterns to make this real are in Beyond Chatbots and Rethinking Workflows .
Gate 2: Evidence of reliability. Establish golden datasets, behaviour tests, and outcome tracking. No expansion without passing reliability bars—see the evaluation approach in Doing AI for Real .
Gate 3: Progressive autonomy. Move slices of the flow from suggest → approve → auto, with explicit confidence thresholds and kill switches. Guardrails and control patterns are covered in Controlling AI .
Gate 4: Scale and sustain. Optimise cost per successful task with caching, routing, and retrieval tuning. Formalise cadence and ownership—platform strategies are detailed in Architecting for Scale .
You realise value when AI sits at the decision point—CRM activities that improve conversion, finance reviews that shorten cycle time, claims adjudication that reduces leakage. Overlays make a specific step faster, better, or cheaper, and they’re easy to instrument.
Speed and safety are not enemies if you instrument them.
Behind every valuable use case sits a platform that turns experiments into services.
What gets managed gets delivered.
Set the rules of the game: insist on in‑path overlays, demand stage gates and deprecation, and hold teams to P&L‑relevant metrics. With a visible cadence and a platform that embeds governance, AI moves from demos to durable advantage. If you want a compact reference architecture and operating checklist, see Architecting for Scale and the implementation guardrails in Controlling AI .
Let’s do something great